Student Motivation
Part 1:
The job of motivating students is not an easy or
lighthearted task. Each student comes
with their own preconceived ideas of a subject and/or the teacher which all
plays into how motivated they will be to learn.
This impression can be changed but not easily. Rhett Mcdaniel of Vanderbilt University talks
in his article Motivating
Students about intrinsic and extrinsic motivators and how to model
those types of motivations for your students (2018). One of his strategies is simply getting to
know your students. This fosters into
relationship building. Mcdaniel goes on
to explain that incorporating your knowledge of the students, their concerns
and background, in addition to your personal interest in their lives, into your
lessons and activities will “inspire their personal loyalty to you.” With that loyalty comes intrinsic motivation
and a platform for growth.
Another strategy offered is to set reasonable performance
goals (Mcdaniel, 2018). This means to
challenge them but also make sure they have the appropriate knowledge and
resources to be successful. I’ve seen
this firsthand in my classroom. I did an
escape room simulation activity this last semester that proved to be somewhat
challenging for students, as it was a cumulative review from the whole
year. Although there was frustration and
an urge to give up, when they finally broke the code you could see the
excitement and motivation levels shoot way up.
Below is a picture of a group that had finally unlocked the box after
several failed attempts.
It is difficult to discuss student motivation without
addressing Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs.
An article
written by Saul McLeod over this hierarchy explicitly states that “our
most basic need is for physical survival, and this will be the first thing that
motivates
our behavior (2018; emphasis
added). I do believe that students
will not build relationships, feel accomplished, or reach their full potential
if their basic needs of food, water, safety, etc. are not met. Therefore it goes back to Mcdaniels point of
knowing your students. We need to
understand where or what they are coming from each morning and build on this
hierarchy so they can engage academically.
(McLeod,
2018)
Part 2:
As educators, it is easy to
become so focused on checking off our list of standards that our day quickly
passes and suddenly we realize that we didn’t authentically engage with any of
our students. If we are not engaging
with them in a real way, we will not get to know them. If we do not know them, we cannot effectively
teach them. This is where blended
learning lends us a big hand. Whether a
flipped model or a station rotation, the blended environment, if done
correctly, allows for authentic face-to-face time with each student. This gives teachers the time to analyze the
hierarchy of needs previously mentioned and work of the pyramid.
Blended learning also allows for
students to get immediate feedback.
Students like to know where they’re going and if they are getting there
the right way. Digital resources can
supply that information in a quick and concise way. As students gain the confidence from positive
feedback and/or clear re-direction, they are motivated to keep at the task at
hand.
However, to make the blended
model work, the teacher has to set it up to do so. Activities and lessons need to be engaging,
authentic, and challenging. Students
need to have (or feel that they have) control over their own learning
(Mcdaniel, 2018). Teachers need to do
the behind the scenes stuff while the students take the main stage. This can be done by modeling enthusiasm over
a subject, showing the relevancy of a topic, or organizing groups and giving
them a problem to solve. At this point,
you can step to the side and interject when needed.
Mcdaniel, R. (2018, May 07). Motivating
Students. Retrieved from https://cft.vanderbilt.edu/guides-sub-pages/motivating-students/
McLeod, S. (2018, May 21). Maslow's Hierarchy
of Needs. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html
Comments
Post a Comment